Streamlining Operations Without Sacrificing Creativity
- Alex Dihel
- Jun 29
- 2 min read
Updated: Sep 25
TL;DR
Creative workflows were bogged down by scattered intake channels, vague briefs, and bloated tooling. I unified our intake system, automated triage, and cleaned up tool licensing. Results, brief completeness at intake up, unplanned scope changes down, higher stakeholder satisfaction, and ~$14.5K saved.
Window and sources: 5 weeks implementation period, Jira and survey data, license audit.
When Chaos Isn’t Creative Anymore
We had reached a tipping point.
Design requests came in from every direction: Slack, email, undocumented Jira tickets. Designers were overloaded, context switching, and chasing details that should’ve been captured up front. At the same time, our tool stack had ballooned into overlapping subscriptions and unused licenses.
The net result? Wasted time, rising frustration, and a team more focused on managing process than doing design.
Constraints: multiple intake channels, vague briefs, and overlapping tool licenses.
Rebuilding the Intake Engine
The first priority was making work findable, clear, and trackable.
We ran a full intake audit and restructured everything:
Consolidated request points into a single Jira intake funnel
Created stream-specific ticket templates to match UX, visual, and motion workflows
Introduced automated triage to tag, route, and escalate requests
Built a visual briefing guide to help stakeholders submit complete, structured briefs
Added automation to flag abandoned or overdue tasks
This gave designers back time, and gave stakeholders a smoother, more transparent request experience.
Decision note: we centralized intake for clarity, and kept a fast lane with a 24-hour SLA for urgent work.
Creativity safeguard: weekly critique and exploration time stayed intact, intake rules protect that time.
Cutting Tool Waste Without Cutting Creativity
The next fix: cost and tooling sanity.
With a growing team and shrinking budgets, we needed smarter controls without disrupting creative flow.
Actions taken:
Audited every design-related subscription across teams
Removed duplicate tools and unused licenses (e.g., redundant Adobe and Figma tiers)
Negotiated vendor plans based on real usage data
Created a simple onboarding doc + license request process to avoid future bloat
We didn’t cut access, we cut confusion and waste.
Governance: monthly license review with a named DRI and a simple request path for special tools.
What Changed: Success Metrics
Window and sources: 5 weeks implementation period, Jira and survey data, license audit, and intake funnel analytics.
Brief completeness at intake: improved from 42% to 87% (107% increase).
Unplanned scope changes: Dropped by 64% per quarter.
Task delivery consistency: Improved from 68% to 94% on-time delivery.
Time to first review: reduced from 5.5 days to 2.1 days (62%).
Stakeholder satisfaction: Increased from 63% to 91% in biannual surveys.
Tooling savings: Saved ~$14.5K in 2024. Reduced Adobe spend by 20%.
Attribution: the intake funnel, templates, and triage cut rework and wait time, and the license audit removed waste without blocking creative work.


